So, who am I?

Entrepreneur. I am a founder and currently Notches, a distributed reviews system.

Lawyer. I am primarily focused on intellectual property law and legal issues that are relevant to startups.

Writer. I've been writing about technology, software development, law and business for six years.

Developer. I have a background in CS and spent 7 years developing enterprise web applications and frameworks before starting Notches.

Cancer Patient. I am undergoing treatment for Stage II Testicular Cancer. You can follow my recovery on BeatingMyCancer.

Read my full bio or view my resume.

"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." -Aristotle

Most Popular Tags


Monthly Archives

Copyright Exceptions and Defenses in the Digital Age Apr 01, 2005

Warning:

This article is more than 45 days old and thus may be somewhat out of date. Please keep this in mind when reading the post. If this is a tutorial, please check whether you are using the same versions mentioned in the article.

Fred von Lohmann started the session by presenting his paper, "iPods, Tivo and Fair Use as Innovation Policy" (PDF). The general theme here is that we need to "rethink fair use in the digital age". The premise of his paper was that in some regard these potentially infringing technologies help create a "consumer surplus" which in the long run is actually a "complimentary use" for the content owners. Prof. Gerald Dworkin, the panel moderator, commented that under US law "fair use" equates to "free use". In reality, he said, there are three options for allowing use: allowing this free use, restricting access entirely, and allowing access with a compulsory (paid) license. He seemed to favor this last option - the idea of "compensation without control." Fred seemed to agree, both in the panel and in a side discussion after the panel, but added that without these initial free uses, the technology would likely not exist for the copyright holders to take advantage of such paid uses. I expect we'll hear more about this in the afternoon Grokster panel.

Richard Owens, director of Copyright for WIPO, then presented about limitations and exceptions in WIPO. He also addressed the "fair dealings" exception. Originally this was a purposive test, has now been expanded to "fair dealings in other uses", which isn't quite as broad as fair use but serves a similar function.  In the panel, Mary Wong said that fair dealings is also no longer purpose driven in Singapore. Jule Sigall was pleased to hear that, despite other general perception, others realized that the US was actually one of the more relaxed nations on copyright.

Jule Sigall of the US Copyright office then talked about the relationship between P2P software and fair use, focusing primarily on Fred's "complimentary use" argument. He said there is a "low gravity" in the P2P market - that is, Grokster couldn't charge for its software even if it wanted to, because people would just switch to Kazaa or BearShare. Their goal in the Copyright Office is to raise that bar.


Other sessions:

permalink Share Related Posts Widget for Blogs by LinkWithin

If you found this post useful, you may want to subscribe to my feed.
Powered by Community Server (Non-Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems