Sign in
in
   
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it."  -Aristotle

About Me

I am a co-founder of Notches, an early stage startup currently based in NYC. We are building a free, open reviews network that anyone can participate in and anyone can build on top of. You can find out more on our official blog.

Read more about my background.

Connect with me on...

Recent Readers

Flickr Photos

 

Warning:

This article is more than 45 days old. Given the speed at which the technology world moves, this post is probably somewhat out of date. Please keep this in mind when reading the post. If this is a tutorial, please check whether you are using the same versions mentioned in the article.

Do the record companies WANT to go out of business?

Furd brings us the latest incredibly stupid move by a record company. EMI targets the ‘mix-tape’ with ’secure CD’:

UK record label EMI announced yesterday it plans to introduce anti-piracy technology to its CDs that will restrict consumers’ ability to burn tracks to blank CDs. The technology, from DRM solutions firm Macrovision, will allow CD owners to copy only three full copies of a CD’s songs, and the burned discs themselves cannot be copied.

[…] The technology also prevents CDs from being transferred to an iPod.

(Emphasis my own). I really, really don't get it. It's obvious they don't either.

I'll say it again: People are willing to PAY for your music, even if it's of questionable legality, but they want to feel like they're getting value. Perhaps most importantly, they want the right to choose how to consume it. Putting DRM that prevents them from putting it on their iPod, which in many cases is why they bought the CD in the first place, will lead to a few possible results, none of which prevent piracy or increase sales.

The most likely result? They will go illegally download a DRM-free version from a P2P network (since we know DRM doesn't work and Macromedia's DRM is easily cracked).

Best case scenario for the record company? They begrudgingly buy the CD, since they have no other choice, and are forever resentful because they can't use something they paid for in a way that at least some record companies have already admitted in court is fair use.

Either way, both consumers and the record companies lose. It won't be the consumers going out of business though. 

Oh, and while we're at it, someone should have a talk with Dave Matthews too.


View related posts

No Comments