Sign in
in
   
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it."  -Aristotle

About Me

I am a co-founder of Notches, an early stage startup currently based in NYC. We are building a free, open reviews network that anyone can participate in and anyone can build on top of. You can find out more on our official blog.

Read more about my background.

Connect with me on...

Recent Readers

Flickr Photos

 

Warning:

This article is more than 45 days old. Given the speed at which the technology world moves, this post is probably somewhat out of date. Please keep this in mind when reading the post. If this is a tutorial, please check whether you are using the same versions mentioned in the article.

iTunes 7 vs. Windows Media Player 11

One of the main reasons I prefer Windows Media Player to iTunes is that WMP monitors folders and automatically updates your library. In other words, if you add or remove folders on your hard drive, the changes are reflected in your library - automatically.  For some inexplicable reason, iTunes doesn't do this. I had been using a wonderful little product called iTunes Library Updater to "fix" the library, but it's a manual process and one that really started to grate on me.

While I really liked some of the new interface and features in Windows Media Player 11, the first beta was just too damn slow - but Beta 2 is MUCH, MUCH faster. The instant search works well, and the video interface is very nice and clean. The integrated Windows Media Connect is also a nice touch.

People are raving about the changes in iTunes 7, so I decided to give it a go with my new 2nd generation nano. Paul calls it "the best software-based media jukebox [he's] ever used." The first thing I noticed is that they finally added an auto-update feature that (appears) not to require a full download for incremental updates. And at first glance, the interface does look nice. I particularly like some of the additional views for managing attached iPods and stats on what is taking up the space.

iTunes 6 was a little sluggish at times, but iTunes 7 is EXCRUCIATINGLY SLOW. When I say slow, I mean ... like.. 5-10 seconds when clicking on a different genre in the browser. And there are a number of funky bugs in the display, where fonts revert to defaults and portions of the screen stop repainting (I tried to get other shots but it seems to happen mostly when the machine is hung). Re-installation improved the experience somewhat, but it's still a bit laggy.

Maybe iTunes is better on Mac OS X, but Microsoft definitely has them beat on Windows... for now.

Only published comments... Sep 22 2006, 05:20 PM by Tim

View related posts

 

Corey said:

How does iTunes 7 sync with a directory? I can't use "keep my folder organized" anymore because I've grown out of a single 250 gig drive and I can't keep everything in one place -- that and I use FolderShare with a 10,000 file limit for new music that needs to be separate as well. I've downloaded the library updater thing in the past, but was too nervous to use it.
September 22, 2006 8:27 PM
   

Tim said:

That's part of the problem - it doesn't :)

September 22, 2006 8:32 PM
 

The Village View said:

I was gonna upgrade iTunes until I read Tim's review

October 3, 2006 12:48 PM
 

Gez said:

iTunes 7 runs as good as any other media player iv used, i havn't seen one bug at all yet. Im using version 7.0.1.8. I got Sata Raid 0 running, maybe that helps lag that people are experiencing, because it seems to responed very quick when i click anything
October 12, 2006 2:38 AM
 

Waseem said:

I use both itunes 7 and media player 11 but i find itunes 7 more exciting than newly launched wmp11. wmp11 isn't enough to be compared with itunes 7 simply becoz of sound quality, easiness of use and damn neat interface love u itunes sorry wmp... Those say windows media player is better god help them...
November 2, 2006 9:31 PM
 

George said:

Media player 11 is as cool as itunes 7 i love both of em but podcasts in itunes take little advantage over wmp looks of wmp and itunes are different so no comment on looks.
November 2, 2006 11:14 PM
 

Dion said:

For audiophiles iTtunes 7.02 is superior to Windows Media Player 11.  

If your computer is connected to higher end reciever via S/PDIF with higher end speakers and audio preferences within quicktime are set 24bit, 96kHz or >, & 5.1> channels ... Itunes blows away Windows Media in sound quality!!

December 11, 2006 11:50 PM
 

Loosely Coupled // Tim Marman's Weblog said:

Like most people, I would prefer to use a single media player to manage my library. I like Windows Media

December 28, 2006 11:33 AM
 

Alex said:

I like them both and use both all he time but i find media player is quicker when downloading cd's. I have a problem though.... after i have put a cd on media player i need the songs to automatically go into iTunes. I know this is possible because my computer did it once but then stopped and i don't know why.... if anyone knows has suggestions please post a comment....

cheers

p.s great blog!!! it's god to see other people trying to manage both iTunes and WMP

January 9, 2007 5:50 AM
 

naturalbornflyer said:

you probably need to go into preferences and select importing...and choose to import directly to itunes when a cd is inserted....this might have changed if you updated your itunes program...so you would need to update your preferences as well.

good luck

February 19, 2007 2:11 AM
 

Mital said:

Windows Media 11 is a load of rubbish, and so is iTunes.

Windows Media would be great if the library database wasn't so unreliable and prone to corruption.

iTunes would be great if it could manage files and metadata the way Windows Media player does, and if it could sync songs to anything other than an ipod.

May 5, 2007 10:31 AM
 

wassup said:

While im not sure about itunes, i find WMP11 using 44MB of memory to be quite a hog

January 28, 2008 8:10 PM