Sign in
in
   
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it."  -Aristotle

About Me

I am a co-founder of Notches, an early stage startup currently based in NYC. We are building a free, open reviews network that anyone can participate in and anyone can build on top of. You can find out more on our official blog.

Read more about my background.

Connect with me on...

Recent Readers

Flickr Photos

 

Warning:

This article is more than 45 days old. Given the speed at which the technology world moves, this post is probably somewhat out of date. Please keep this in mind when reading the post. If this is a tutorial, please check whether you are using the same versions mentioned in the article.

Understanding the Option Backdating scandals

It is legal to grant an in-money option - there is nothing in corporate law that prevents anyone from backdating an option. So why are all these CEOs and CFOs going to jail? (Well, if you're not Steve Jobs that is, since he gets a free pass).

The companies are issuing Incentive Stock Options (ISOs), which means you have to pay ordinary income tax. Because they are reported as ISOs, people who receive them are not paying the right tax and companies are not reporting them on the right way. An ISO postpones tax on the option from the date of exercise to the date of sale, and gives you a good shot at capital gains treatment on the entire thing. In other words, getting an ISO instead of a NQO postpones and potentially lowers the tax.

But then, people are not going to jail for tax evasion - they are going to jail for violating securities laws.

The simple answer is that it's fraud. When you issue an in-money option, the accounting rules require at the very least that the amount is in the money is an expense cost to the company. As a result, the transaction violates disclosure and accounting requirements in securities laws.

(Maybe that's part of the reason Apple is charging for the wireless upgrade - they have enough accounting troubles as it is.)

If they wanted to do this legally, they could have by categorizing and reporting it properly, but ultimately they wanted ISO tax treatment for options that didn't otherwise qualify.

Only published comments... Jan 26 2007, 02:57 AM by Tim

View related posts

No Comments