Sign in
in
   
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it."
-Aristotle

About Me

I am a co-founder of Notches, an early stage startup currently based in NYC. We are building a free, open reviews network that anyone can participate in and anyone can build on top of. You can find out more on our official blog.

Read more about my background.

Connect with me on...

Recent Readers

Flickr Photos

 

Warning:

This article is more than 45 days old. Given the speed at which the technology world moves, this post is probably somewhat out of date. Please keep this in mind when reading the post. If this is a tutorial, please check whether you are using the same versions mentioned in the article.

Taking on WestLaw and LexisNexis

Carl Malamud is taking on WestLaw and LexisNexis.

Carl Malamud has this funny idea that public domain information ought to be... well, public. He has a history of creating public access databases on the net when the provider of the data has failed to do so or has licensed its data only to a private company that provides it only for pay. His technique is to build a high-profile demonstration project with the intent of getting the actual holder of the public domain information (usually a government agency) to take over the job.

Carl's done this in the past with the SEC's Edgar database, with the Smithsonian, and with Congressional hearings. But now, he's set his eyes on the crown jewels of public data available for profit: the body of Federal case law that is the foundation of multi-billion dollar businesses such as WestLaw.

There's not much content there yet, but this would be such a welcome development if it takes off. The prices that WestLaw and LexisNexis charge are just outrageous as pretty much exclusive access to this public domain content. 

Thomson used to have a real racket with SEC filings, but the EDGAR database has definitely leveled the playing field. There are still companies out there charging for access to the data, but at least we're able to make our decisions based on the quality of their API and cost of the service instead of a monopoly or oligopoly situation.

If nothing else, this will hopefully force WestLaw and LexisNexis to either open up their services more for the public-domain information or at least drive prices down.

Only published comments... Aug 24 2007, 09:55 AM by Tim

View related posts

No Comments