|
E.Spat brings us this gem of a rant on legal textbooks. Dear Mueller and Kirkpatrick, Your evidence book SUCKS. What's the point of having a problem on every other page if you never give any indication of what the answers are? I am reading your book because I DON'T KNOW ABOUT EVIDENCE. And would you cut it out with the notes that consist entirely of questions? "The court was right, wasn't it, in saying this wasn't hearsay? It would be odd, wouldn't it, if they had decided the other way? It's true, isn't it, that the statement was under oath?" Just TELL US SOMETHING. Your book makes me want to tear my hair out. No, it makes me want to jump off the nearest bridge, shaking my fist at the sky and yelling, "Damn you, Mueller and Kirkpatrick!" It would be melodramatic, wouldn't it, if I did that? Having used Meuller last semester, I can empathize... and I've ranted about this in the past too. Many legal textbooks are 1,000 pages of cases, often with very little additional insight and questionable...
|