Sign in
in
   
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it."  -Aristotle

About Me

I am a co-founder of Notches, an early stage startup currently based in NYC. We are building a free, open reviews network that anyone can participate in and anyone can build on top of. You can find out more on our official blog.

Read more about my background.

Connect with me on...

<style> ul.padded li { padding-left: 5px; } </style>
<script src="http://api.notch.es/jscript/NotchesBadge.js"></script> <script>new NotchesBadge("My Reviews","tim",7);</script>

Recent Readers

<script src="http://pub.mybloglog.com/comm2.php?mblID=2006113020344226&amp;c_width=294&amp;c_sn_opt=n&amp;c_rows=2&amp;c_img_size=f&amp;c_heading_text=&amp;c_color_heading_bg=B7EOFF&amp;c_color_heading=1E4A6F&amp;c_color_link_bg=B7EOFF&amp;c_color_link=1E4A6F&amp;c_color_bottom_bg=B7EOFF"></script>

Flickr Photos

<script src="http://www.flickr.com/badge_code_v2.gne?count=6&amp;display=latest&amp;size=s&amp;layout=x&amp;source=user&amp;user=50409940%40N00"></script>
 

Browse by Tags

All Tags » Things that bother me » Law » Intellectual Property » Rants (RSS)
  • When will the NFL Network standoff end?

    Like so many others , I was furious when I couldn't watch the Packers-Cowboys games a few weeks back. The NFL Network is only carried on satellite which is simply not an option for many of us in urban areas like NYC. For those who haven't been paying attention, there's been a long-running standoff between the cable companies and the NFL network. (ComCast carries it at a premium, but neither Time Warner or Cablevision offer it, free or otherwise). To sum up: The NFL wants its network carried on basic cable packages with channels such as ESPN or CNN, where it can reach the broadest possible audience. Cable companies including Time Warner Inc. say it belongs on a sports package, or tier, where its audience would include only those fans willing to pay extra. I am a huge fan of the NFL and would certainly subscribe in a second. Much like the issues with net neutrality, the problem is that we're not dealing with a perfect market. If Time Warner doesn't offer me the ability...
  • Was DRM-free music an Apple innovation?

    Some people have tried to paint the recent announcement by Apple as example of Apple innovating and Microsoft following . Headlines like " Microsoft changes tune on selling DRM-free songs " are simply misleading - none of the technology companies truly wanted DRM, but they were a necessary evil in selling music that they did not own. As I've discussing in previous posts , Microsoft, Real Networks, and Yahoo! were all instrumental in the anti-DRM movement. Most labels seem to get it - these decisions and stratregy are more often coming from the corporate parents, not the labels themselves. In fact, Gates criticized DRM months before Jobs' manifesto a month ago, and EMI had been reportedly been considering releasing DRM-free tracks in MP3 format for awhile. This initially-exclusive deal with EMI simply demonstrates Apple's significant marketshare for purchased music and influence in the market. The mere fact that Apple was lucky and/or powerful enough to convince a major label to do something...